For our anniversary, my husband planned a romantic lake getaway. I woke up early and went to refill my coffee, only to see his phone lit up with a message that said, “Did she drink it?” I put his phone down, walked back to the dock, and started building the case.

I had been doing that professionally for over a decade.

I applied every skill I had.

The insurance fraud alone, the forged signature on the policy application, was a federal offense that changed the nature of the charges significantly. When investigators pulled his financial records, what they found was consistent with what I had suspected from the pattern of his behavior over the past 2 years.

He had accumulated substantial debt through a series of failed investments that he had never told me about. Some of it financed through accounts I did not know existed. Some of it borrowed from people who were not patient about repayment.

$800,000 was not an arbitrary number. It was the number he needed.

His girlfriend, I will call her that because that is what she was, was brought in for questioning on Sunday evening. She had deleted the messages on her end, which told investigators something important about her awareness that what she was participating in was criminal.

Deleted messages, as any forensic professional will tell you, are not gone. They are relocated.

Her phone’s recovery took less than a day.

His sister retained a lawyer before investigators even reached out to her, which in practice functioned as a confirmation of everything that needed confirming. She would later attempt to argue that she had not known the specifics of what her brother intended, that she thought he was planning something else entirely, but that “be careful” was a phrase she used routinely without particular meaning.

The jury did not find this persuasive.

I want to be honest about what the weeks that followed were like, because I think there is a version of this story that gets told as a kind of triumph, and I do not think that framing is accurate or fair to the reality of surviving something like this.

I went back to St. Louis on Sunday afternoon with my car and my overnight bag and a set of documentation so thorough that my attorney later told me she had never seen a private citizen walk into her office better prepared.

I went back to the house we had shared, which was too quiet in a specific way that had nothing to do with sound. And I sat on the couch, and the stone that had been sitting in my chest since Friday morning finally finished falling.

I cried for about 4 hours. Not prettily. The ugly, formless kind that has no particular object, that is less about grief than about the sudden absence of a structure you had been holding yourself inside without realizing it.

I cried about the playlist on the drive down. I cried about the sharp cheddar in the cooler. I cried about the couple’s therapist and the 8 months since we had stopped going, and whether any of it had been real at any point, or whether I had simply been useful to him until I was worth more dead.

That last question is the one that took the longest to stop asking.

My friend stayed with me for the first week. She slept in the guest room and made coffee every morning before I was up and did not require me to talk about it when I did not want to and listened when I did.

I am not sure I have ever been more grateful for another person’s specific way of existing in a space.

The legal process took 11 months in total. I was called as a witness, which was an unusual experience for someone who has spent her career as the person doing the reconstructing rather than the person being questioned.

I answered everything directly and without elaboration. My attorney told me afterward that I was the most composed witness she had seen in 15 years of family litigation, and I told her that composure is not the same as being okay.

And she said she knew that.

And we left it at that.

He was convicted on charges of conspiracy to commit murder, insurance fraud, and forgery. His girlfriend was convicted as a co-conspirator. His sister received a lesser charge for her role in providing a false alibi, though the communication evidence meant the prosecution could establish knowing involvement.

At sentencing, he looked at me across the courtroom with an expression I had not seen from him before. I have thought about it many times since, and I have not been able to identify it with certainty.

It was not remorse exactly. It was something more complicated than that. Something that looked like a person confronting the distance between who they believed themselves to be and what the record showed.

I did not look away.

I did not owe him that.

After everything was finalized, the divorce, the asset division, the closing of the house, I took a leave of absence from my firm. I had accrued more than 3 months of unused time off, a fact that struck me as quietly representative of something about how I had been living.

I went to stay with my parents in the town where I grew up, which I had not done for more than a long weekend in years.

My mother did not push for details. She made food and put it in front of me and sat with me in the evenings and said, when I finally told her as much as I could bring myself to say, only that she was glad I was here and that she had always thought something was off about him, but had not wanted to say so.

I asked her why not. She said because I had seemed happy and she had hoped she was wrong.

I told her she was not wrong.

She already knew that.

One afternoon, about 6 weeks into my leave, I was sitting at my parents’ kitchen table with a cup of coffee and the early November light coming in flat and pale through the window.

Prev|Part 4 of 5|Next

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *